A Comparative Analysis between Islamic Economics and Environmental Economics: Historical Development and its Significance for Contemporary Challenges

A Comparative Analysis between Islamic Economics and Environmental Economics: Historical Development and its Significance for Contemporary Challenges

Authors

  • Ahmet Faruk Aysan (Author) Professor
  • Miranda Canga (Author) student
  • Umar Nawaz Kayani (Author)
https://doi.org/10.51331/bemA02
A Comparative Analysis between Islamic Economics and Environmental Economics: Historical Development and its Significance for Contemporary Challenges. (2024). Journal of Balkan Economies and Management, 1(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.51331/bemA02

This article investigates the possible relationship between Islamic and Environmental Economics to address environmental concerns. Comparative analysis shows that Environmental Economics has been more successful in addressing environmental challenges, even though both frameworks approach the economic activity with different concepts. Environmental Economics has been successful because of its all-encompassing focus on environmental factors, acceptance on a worldwide scale, relevance of policies, and individual-centered methodology. On the other hand, Islamic economics, which functions mainly at the community level, needs more clarity with broader implementation. The strengths of each strategy are examined in this research, which concludes that environmental economics provides a more flexible and universally applicable framework for promoting economic activity by environmental preservation. The results add to the current discussion on sustainable development by highlighting the significance of combining realistic, internationally recognized strategies with moral principles to create a sustainable future.

Abubakar, & Aysan. (2021). The Ascent of Islamic Social Finance Research. HAL, Article hal-03341729. https://hal.science/hal-03341729/

Alam, N., Duygun, M., & Ariss, R. T. (2016). Green Sukuk: An Innovation in Islamic Capital Markets. Energy and Finance, 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32268-1_10

Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2008, November 1). Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020107.112927

Aysan, A. F., & Al-Saudi, H. A. (2023). Blockchain technology and the potential of waqf (Islamic endowment) sector revival. Journal of AI, Robotics & Workplace Automation, 2(4), 317-326.

Carolus, J. F., Hanley, N., Olsen, S. B., & Pedersen, S. M. (2018, October). A Bottom-up Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis. Ecological Economics, 152, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.009

COP28 UAE - United Nations Climate Change Conference. (n.d.). https://www.cop28.com/en/

European Union. (2022). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/591 of 17 December 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022D0591

Furqani, H. (2015, February 9). Individual and society in an Islamic ethical framework. Humanomics, 31(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/h-04-2014-0037

Germani A.R. (2004). “Environmental Law and Economics in U.S. and E.U.: a Common Ground?”, CeFiMs - SOAS – Discussion Paper n. 45, available at http://www.cefims.ac.uk/documents/research-34.pdf

Hasan, Z. (2016). The evolution of Islamic economics: A critical analysis. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 8(2), 9-25.

Jang, G. Y., Kang, H. G., Lee, J. Y., & Bae, K. (2020, April 23). ESG Scores and the Credit Market. Sustainability, 12(8), 3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083456

Least developed countries cannot afford to strand their assets, given their development challenges. (2021, November 26). UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/news/least-developed-countries-cannot-afford-strand-their-assets-given-their-development-challenges

Mat Rahim, S. R., & Mohamad, Z. Z. (2018, August 15). Green Sukuk for Financing Renewable Energy Projects. Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 5(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.26414/m031

Muqorobin, M. (2008, April). Journey of Islamic economics in the modern world. In Proceedings of The Seventh International Conference on Islamic Economics (pp. 385-404).

Mensah, J. (2019, January). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531

OECD (2018, June 25). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment Further Developments and Policy Use. OECD Publishing. http://books.google.ie/books?id=DvBhDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Cost-Benefit+Analysis+and+the+Environment&hl=&cd=3&source=gbs_api

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2002). Integrating Environment and Development: A Synthesis of Existing Knowledge. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/dac/environment-development/1899857.pdf

Paul, B. D. (2008). A history of the concept of sustainable development: literature review. The Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Sciences Series, 17(2), 576-580.

Pearce, D. (2002, November). An Intellectual History of Environmental Economics. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.27.122001.083429

Rusydiana, A. S., & Irfany, M. I. (2021, April 15). Proposing Blue Sukuk in Indonesia: An Interpretive Structural Model. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 6(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v6i1.333

Salleh, M. S. (2011, December). Islamic economics revisited: Re-contemplating unresolved structure and assumptions. In 8th International Conference on Islamic Economics and Finance. Doha, Qatar (pp. 19-21).

Sookram, R., & Kistow, B. (2012). Capital budgeting and sustainable enterprises: Ethical implications. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 5(1), 4.

Spash, C. (1999, November 1). The Development of Environmental Thinking in Economics. Environmental Values, 8(4), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327199129341897

Sustainable Development Goals | United Nations. (n.d.). United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/page/sustainable-development-goals

The Development of Blue Sukuk and Blended Blue Finance - Transformations in Action. (2022, September 15). Transformations in Action. https://action.oceanpanel.org/initiative/indonesia/the-development-of-blue-sukuk-and-blended-blue-finance/

United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Green Waqf Framework. Retrieved from https://climatepromise.undp.org/sites/default/files/research_report_document/INS-20SEP-GREEN%20WAQF%20FRAMEWORK.pdf

World Bank. (2022). Case Study: Malaysia Green Sukuk Market Development. Retrieved from https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/21c2fb7dfb189f10a0503004757b03f4-0340012022/original/Case-Study-Malaysia-Green-Sukuk-Market-Development.pdf

There are 27 references in total.

Downloads

Article Information

  • File Downloads 138
  • Abstract Views 252
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.